Virginia Judge Finds That There IS a Division - 57-9 Applicable
From Truro:
Judge Bellows has ruled that the Virginia statute which determines property rights after the division of a church is applicable to our situation because such a division had occurred by the time we held our congregational vote.
The judge found that,
"ECUSA/Diocese argue that the historical evidence demonstrates that it is only the "major" or "great" divisions within 19th- century churches that prompted the passage of 57-9, such as those within the Presbyterian and Methodist Churches. ECUSA/Diocese argue that the current "dispute" before this Court is not such a "great" division, and, therefore, this is yet another reason why 57-9(A) should not apply.
The judge found that,
"ECUSA/Diocese argue that the historical evidence demonstrates that it is only the "major" or "great" divisions within 19th- century churches that prompted the passage of 57-9, such as those within the Presbyterian and Methodist Churches. ECUSA/Diocese argue that the current "dispute" before this Court is not such a "great" division, and, therefore, this is yet another reason why 57-9(A) should not apply.
The Court agrees that it was major divisions such as those with in the Methodist and Presbyterian churches that prompted the passage of 57-9.
However, it blinks at reality to characterize the ongoing division within the Diocese, ECUSA, and the Anglican Communion as anything but a division of the first magnitude, especially given the involvement of numerous churches in states across the country, the participation of hundreds of church leaders, both lay and pastoral, who have found themselves "taking sides" against their brethren, the determination by thousands of church members in Virginia and elsewhere to "walk apart" in the language of the Church, the creation of new and substantial religious entities, such as CANA, with their own structures and disciplines, the rapidity with which the ECUSA's problems became that of the Anglican Communion, and the consequent impact-in some case the extraordianry impact- on its provinces around the world, and, perhaps most importantly, the creation of a level of distress among many church members so profound and wrenching as to lead them to cast votes in an attempt to disaffiliate from a church which has been their home and heritage throughout their lives, and often back for generations.
Whatever may be the precise threshold for a dispute to constitute a division under 57-9(A), what occurred here qualifies."
The judge will now hold hearings on whether 57-9 is constitutional. However, an appeal is likely and may delay the final resolution of this case.
The judge will now hold hearings on whether 57-9 is constitutional. However, an appeal is likely and may delay the final resolution of this case.
**************************************************************
Judge Bellows' Ruling HERE
ADV News Release HERE
Washington Times reports HERE
Richmond Times-Dispatch/AP article HERE
Washington Examiner/AP article HERE
NY Times Article HERE
LA Times/Reuters Article HERE
